International Programs since 1924

Tag: Soft Power

A Call for Greater US Government Leadership in Ensuring Human Security Outcomes

The Case of the Export-Import Bank and the International Development Finance Corporation

In recent years, the United States government has adopted a geopolitical strategy of diversifying the sourcing of critical minerals in an effort to reduce dependence on China.  This objective gained considerable steam under the Biden administration and continues to be a priority of the second Trump administration.

Two US government trade support agencies – the Export Import Bank (EXIM) and the International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) — are making sizeable loans, debt guarantees, and equity investments to aid extractive industries and the building of infrastructure required to bring minerals and petroleum to market.   These two agencies have become the centerpiece of US efforts to increasingly extract resources such as copper, cobalt, graphite, coltan, tantalum and lithium needed for the transition to more climate friendly economies, the growth of the Artificial Intelligence industry, and for national defense.[i]

These two agencies are in a position to play a leadership role in working with private sector partner companies to ensure highest standards for community development.  This will not only advance the US government’s development, economic growth, and foreign policy objectives, but will provide benefits to private sector firms through risk reduction and the enhancement of their brands.

IWA’s Extractive Industry and Human Development Center is committed to researching and publishing information about best practices by private and public sector actors in this domain to be used as models for approaches that while ensuring stable operations also promote human development.

The Retreat of American Soft Power in Africa: Why US Business Interests Should Be Concerned

The Trump Administration has jettisoned so-called soft power foreign policy practices that for decades created goodwill toward the U.S. and increased American influence around the world at a relatively low cost. An inventory of soft power tools includes humanitarian assistance, investments in public health, conflict resolution and stabilization initiatives, democracy and free speech promotion, and the broadcasting of trustworthy news and information.

The weakening of U.S. soft power comes at a time when the U.S. and other Western governments are seeking to break China’s near monopoly on the mining and processing of strategic materials required by digital infrastructure critical to national defense and for achieving a sustainable energy future.

The massive up-front investment required in mining and related operations renders the current climate of heightened political and operational risk particularly problematic for business interests. The dramatic recent pullback from the use of so-called soft power by the United States has created a vacuum in the human security space that geopolitical rivals are capitalizing on to discredit western business activities in the developing world.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén